Often I am faced with requests to keep things simpler of the Microbiome Prescription site while getting requests to give more choices (often arising from people’s belief of what may work). I have just finished a revision attempting to balance these two (and set up infrastructure to give more choices in the future)
The Expert Criteria takes you to a new page that has many criteria listed:
There will be differences from each choice, because the bacteria selected will likely be different. For one sample:
- Use JasonH (15 Criteria) – 7 bacteria
- Use Medivere (54 Criteria) – 7 bacteria
- Use Metagenomics (59 Criteria) – 7 Bacteria
- Use Nirvana/CosmosId (36 Criteria) – 7 Bacteria
- Use XenoGene (22 Criteria) – 7 Bacteria
- Standard Lab Ranges (+/- 2 Std Dev) – 9 Bacteria
- Box Plot Whisker – 59 Bacteria
- Kaltoft-Moltrup Normal Ranges – 64 Bacteria
- Percentile in top or bottom %
- 10% — 127 Bacteria
- 5% — 55 Bacteria
- 1% — 6 Bacteria
Why the differences? With only a few dozen bacteria with ranges, the chance of being picked is low. Box Plot and KM are computed for almost every bacteria. So with 700 bacteria, we have around 10% picked. With just 50 bacteria to be examined, we have around 14% picked.
These choices are also available in Advance Suggestions
Recent Comments